Archive for the ‘Auto Reviews’ Category

My Lexus HS250h experience – Wrap up & Picture aplenty

November 9th, 2009

After living with the first ever Lexus dedicated hybrid for a week I have to say this is just not my kind of car. Sure the mileage is great for a midsize luxury sedan, sure the interior is solidly build, sure the powertrain is a magnificent piece of work but ultimately I just couldn’t see myself spending $40k on it. Like I’ve mentioned before the handling and ride just are not up to the normal Lexus standard and although beauty is in eyes of beholders I just couldn’t warm up to its styling. Even though the Lexus hybrid is really more, much more, than a glorified Prius but being as a Lexus owner I have to say that I’ve expected more from Lexus than this round of execution. In my honest opinion I truly believe that an ES hybrid with the same powertrain would be a much better car all around than the HS250h.

Enjoy the pictures below with the HS250h in Napa Valley and San Francisco:

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Tags: ,
Posted in Auto Reviews, Lexus | Comments (1)

My Lexus HS250h experience – Powertrain & Fuel Economy

November 2nd, 2009

The powertrain, in my opinion, is one of the few bright spots about the HS, the 2.4-liter Atkinson-cycle powerplant delivers healthy 187 combined HP through the smooth CVT transmission. Although the hand-off between the gasoline engine and electric motor is noticeable but it is probably the best in the hybrid world up to date. Lexus claim 0 to 60 in 8.7 seconds and according to my butt-lerometer is about just right, which is not bad at all for a hybrid that returns 35 MPG combined.

During the week that I had the HS250h I have put over 1,400 miles on the car, the distribution is about 2/3 highway and 1/3 city. According to the trip computer I have achieved over 34 MPG (34.3 to be exact) over the entire week, almost identical to the EPA numbers:

1101091506-00

Overall the HS is very impressive in the powertrain department, it is just a better suspension tuning away from being another Lexus masterpiece.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Tags: ,
Posted in Auto Reviews, Lexus | Comments (6)

My Lexus HS250h experience – Handling & Ride

November 1st, 2009

g_ext1_HS-101During my 3-day, 1000-mile trip up north to San Francisco and Napa Valley, I’ve learned a lot about the HS’ ride and handling characteristics in both high speed and city crawling conditions. Following I’ll try to break down the pros and cons of the dynamics side of Lexus’ first ever dedicated hybrid.

Handling: During low speed one could easily mistaken the HS for one of the FWD sports sedans since the steering wheel has a nice weight to it, although the steering isn’t insanely sharp like the BMW and Porsche but it is precise nevertheless. The car felt confident on long and wide curvy roads as long as one doesn’t push it to the limit; once push it, heavy understeer will occur to remind you that this is not your typical sports sedan. Like I have mentioned before, the heavy weighed steering wheel will make you think this car has a whole different characteristic than the lighter and softer ES, and if you do think like that then you have been greatly mistaken. The low speed steering feel is what Lexus want you to think about the HS but high speed handling is what’s real about this car, the car felt floated and steering felt vague at high speed cruise just like its big brother ES. As matter of fact, due to the HS being higher, those characteristics sometimes felt even stronger on the Lexus hybrid.

Ride: At first impression the suspension on the HS felt much firmer than the ES, in some degrees it almost felt like the GS on smooth pavements. However, on uneven pavements the HS bounces just as much as the ES but due to the firmer suspension, it felt kind of weird. It is kind of hard to explain that through words because normally it’s easy to understand how a soft suspension to bounce up and down all over the place but for a firmer ride like the HS, one would expect a more stable ride. HS seems to be able to defy all that logic and deliver a firm and yet bouncing ride… Let me just put it this way, this is definitely not the best setup I’ve experienced in my driving life.

To sum it up, the HS is not one of the best Lexus executions in terms of ride and handling, to be a bit extreme, I have to say that it could be one of the worst from Toyota’s luxury division. It is not a bad luxury daily driver that delivers decent fuel economy; however, I’ll pick my IS350 or even the softer ES350 over the HS for long road trips without a second thought.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Tags: ,
Posted in Auto Reviews, Lexus | Comments (0)

My Lexus HS250h experience – Sizing up

October 31st, 2009

During the whole week, the most frequent comment I got from the people who saw the HS in real life for the first time was:

“Wow, the car is much bigger than I expected, isn’t it smaller than the IS?”

So I always tell them that the HS is actually sized in between the compact IS and the almost-full-size ES, however the that’s-unbelievable look from their eyes always makes me chuckle. On paper the HS is 4.5 inches longer, 3.2 inches taller but about half inch narrower than the IS from the outside; from the inside the HS has almost full 4 inches more legroom for the rear passengers. It is kind of hard to picture all that from imagination so I took a few pictures with the HS side by side with my IS350 to make HS250h’s actual size more obvious:

HS vs IS_1

HS vs IS_2

It’s really amazing how Lexus is able to make to make the HS look A LOT smaller than it really is, whether that’s good or bad is entirely up to each individual…

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Tags: ,
Posted in Auto Reviews, Lexus | Comments (0)

My Lexus HS250h experience – Start up

October 27th, 2009

g_int15_HS-020When the power button is pressed, the car is in full silent except for the instrument lights lighting up; then after about 10 seconds the engine will fire up, it is a totally different experience than any ICE cars.

Also, the car will travel on full EV mode for a period of time if the speed does not exceed 15 mph. It seems a bit pointless on paper but is very useful when entering and backing up from garage.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Tags: ,
Posted in Auto Reviews, Lexus | Comments (0)

My Lexus HS250h experience – First impression

October 26th, 2009

HSredHSred_intSo, after coupe months of waiting, I finally got my hands on a HS for the week-long test drive. I plan to write about the car whenever something interesting or informative pops up, kind of like Twitter, so stay tuned…

The one that was given to me is a base model with navigation, light maroon (Lexus calls it Metador Red Mica) exterior and tan interior. The first impression I got from this car is that it is definitely bigger than it appears in the pictures, especially when comparing to other Lexus models then one can clearly see that it is sized right between the IS and ES. The interior is very straight forward and pleasant and Remote Touch is fairly easy to use with virtually no learning curve (unlike those knobs on the Germans…). Overall the interior is standard Lexus and the leather padded center stack/console and top of the gauge cluster are definitely nice touch. However, I did spot a few cost cutting executions around the cabin, first the lower part of the door panels are made out of hard plastic, then I noticed that the reading lights for the front passengers aren’t LED and there are not reading lights for rear passengers at all. Obviously those aren’t deal breakers considering how Lexus was able to make such a high tech car at a very obtainable price.

Driving impression will be coming later.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Tags: ,
Posted in Auto Reviews, Lexus | Comments (0)

The perfect storm – Lexus LFA vs. MB SLS AMG (updated with official specs)

October 23rd, 2009

LFA vs SLSFollowing are the performance specs released by the manuactures for both cars:

Lexus LFA / MB SLS AMG

Power Rating: 552 HP / 563 HP
Torque Rating: 354 lb-ft / 430 lb-ft
Curb Weight: 3,263 lbs / 3,571 lbs
Engine Type: 4.8L V10 / 6.3L V8
Engine Placement: Front-mid / Front-mid
Drive Type: RWD / RWD
0 – 60 Acceleration: 3.6 sec / 3.7 sec
Top Speed: 202 mph / 197 mph
Price: ~ $375,000 US / ~250,000 US

As you can see, these two cars match up pretty well on all aspects, including mechanical setup, performance and weight (The SLS is heavier by ~300 lbs). The only difference seems to be AMG prefers the high displacement, high torque V8 but Lexus went with the small displacement, high revving (redline at 9000 rpm) V10.

If that’s not enough to convince you that this is the match-up made in heaven, how about this: The MB SLS AMG is the first car ever developed solely from the ground up by MB’s performance department – AMG. The Lexus LF-A on the other hand is the first supercar from Toyota and many would argue that it is the first true exotic from any Japanese automakers. With that in mind when both cars go on sale in 2010 (or 2011…) we can expect to read all about their head-to-head comparison from all the major automotive publications. So…

Let the hype begin!

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Auto Industry, Auto Reviews, Lexus, Second Opinion | Comments (1)

Why I think today’s automotive publications are only good as restroom reading materials…

October 15th, 2009

IL crap2010_audi_s4_group_ct_2_717According to the Audi S4 vs. BMW 335i comparison test from Edmunds InsideLine:

Audi S4

Base MSRP: $46,725
As-tested MSRP: $59,150
Slalom (mph): 68.8 (67.2 with stability control on)
Skid pad (g): 0.90 (0.92 with stability control on)
0-60: 4.9 seconds
Curb weight, as-tested (lbs.): 3,984

BMW 335i

Base MSRP: $41,125
As-tested MSRP: $49,320
Slalom (mph): 68.4
Skid pad (g): 0.92
0-60: 5.3 seconds
Curb weight, as-tested (lbs.): 3,607

Now, stop reading for a second, look at the test results again and try to come up with a winner OBJECTIVELY. when you are ready, read on.

Okay, so the BMW is cheaper (by 10 grands according the as-test price and good luck on finding a S4 that’s below $50k on the lot), handles equally well, is lighter, has better steering feel and is only a tad slower than the S4… But the Audi S4 still ends up as the winner? I mean, seriously, WTF?

No, I haven’t been in the new S4 yet but based on my experienced in the new A4 Quattro, countless times in the 335i and this sentence from the comparo write-up:

“We still prefer the more natural feel of the BMW’s steering to the S4’s responsive but slightly over-boosted setup.”

I would think the 335i would end up as the winner, by a narrow margin nevertheless but still… I mean the only strong suit of the S4 seems to be more “confident” due to the AWD setup, but what happen to that “true driver’s car” banner the automotive editors always like to wave? What about that thrill that only the RWD cars can provide? So is InsideLine openly admitting here that technology > the enthusiasts? Aren’t all the automotive editors should be enthusiasts? Isn’t that the reason they always knock on the Lexus because it’s not always about the numbers, it’s about the “feel”?

Seriously, Edmunds IL, WHAT ARE YOU SMOKING?

Oh and by the way… Audi, what are you thinking when you priced the S4? Who the heck is going to pay for a $60k S4 when anyone can special order a M3 for $56k? GEEZ!

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

[Source: Edmunds IL]

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Auto Industry, Auto Reviews, On-Crack Series, Second Opinion | Comments (2)

The perfect storm – Lexus LF-A vs. MB SLS AMG

September 9th, 2009

LF-A_SLSFollowing are the rumored performance specs for both cars:

Lexus LF-A

Power rating: 550+ HP
Torque rating: 369 lb-ft
Engine type: 4.8L V10
Engine placement: Front/mid-mount
Drive type: RWD
0 – 60 acceleration: ~ 3.5 seconds
Top Speed: 210+ mph
Price: ~ $250,000 US

MB SLS AMG

Power rating: 563 HP
Torque rating: 480 lb-ft
Engine type: 6.3L V8
Engine placement: Front/mid-mount
Drive type: RWD
0 – 60 acceleration: 3.7 seconds
Top Speed: 197 mph
Price: ~ $250,000 US

As you can see, these two cars match up pretty well on all aspects, including mechanical setup, performance and even down to pricing. The only difference seems to be AMG prefers the high displacement, high torque V8 but Lexus went with the small displacement, high revving (Max engine speed is nearly 9000 rpm) V10.

If that’s not enough to convince you that this is the match-up made in heaven, how about this: The MB SLS AMG is the first car ever developed solely from the ground up by MB’s performance department – AMG. The Lexus LF-A on the other hand is the first supercar from Toyota and many would argue that it is the first true exotic from any Japanese automakers. With that in mind when both cars go on sale in 2010 we can expect to read all about their head-to-head comparison from all the major automotive publications. So…

Let the hype begin!

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Auto Industry, Auto Reviews, Lexus | Comments (1)

Post accident loaner car review (part 2: 2009 Volvo S60)

July 30th, 2009

ext2_S60_455_000782_2009S6025TDue to the broken moon roof, heavy steering and couple with an engine that’s somewhat “unfriendly” to the automatic transmission (covered in part 1: ) I’ve decided to take the BMW 328i back and switch for another car after one week. I called Enterprise up and they told me the only equivalent car they have at the time is a Volvo S60. Given that I’ve never driven one before I decide to make the switch so I ended up with a 2009 steel gray Volvo S60 with a black interior and about 5000 miles. Following is the summary of my impression for the car:

Exterior: Given that the S60 is at the end of its production cycle (2009 being its 9th year for the current generation) so obviously the car looks dated. However, the styling is unique enough so even after a pathetically long production cycle it still stands out in its own Scandinavian distinctive way. Paint job although is nothing to write home about but yet not bad by any means. This particular car has four gazillion-spoke chrome wheels that makes me want to puke my brain out but with other wheel options such as the one in the picture it is actually a somewhat handsome car, perfect for young executives/professionals in their early 30s.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Auto Reviews | Comments (4)

Post accident loaner car review (part 1: 2008 BMW 328i)

July 27th, 2009

bmwdea9

About two weeks ago my car was sandwiched while waiting at the light, someone decided I must have been moving because “my brake light is off”… Hey idiot, ever heard about the concept of PUTTING THE GEAR IN NEUTRAL? Just because my brake light is off doesn’t automatically mean that I am moving! Anyways, long story short, both the front and rear bumpers of my car were damaged so the insurance company got me a loaner from Enterprise while my car was in the body shop.

How I got the 328i from Enterprise you might ask… Well, the rate I was given is for a premium class car but lucky for me they ran out of premium cars on that day. Due to company policy they have to upgrade me to luxury which means I got the only luxury car on the lot, a 2008 black on black BMW 328i with about 25,000 miles. Following is the summary of my impression for the car:

Exterior: Well, there really is nothing to write home about the 328i’s exterior styling. Given that this is a base model so it comes with standard halogen headlight, which means no BMW angel eyes, bummer… Also, since this is not a sport package so the standard issue 16-inch wheels are at all four corners. I’ve stated before that I am not a fan about BMW’s paint job in recent year and this one is no exception, orange peel is very noticeable on this car given the black paint. It’s really not a surprise to me since I’ve noticed visible orange peel on BMW’s much higher end models such as 7-series and M6. Overall the styling is plain, inoffensive but very suitable for the class’ best seller, it is just like a Honda Accord in the entry level luxury sedan segment.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Auto Reviews | Comments (0)

July 1991 Road & Track: SC400 Road Test

July 21st, 2009

Seems like it was just yesterday when the SC300/400 was introduced and wowed the entire automotive industry. Back in 1991 the SC was the benchmark of a perfectly balanced coupe between luxury and performance. It doesn’t have the “in your face” styling nor does it have the Cadillac-like land yacht ride but it delivers the exceptional luxury at the same time makes driving enjoyable.

Let’s take a walk down the memory lane to see what R&T had to say about the SC400 in its first road test back in July 1991:


Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Tags: , ,
Posted in Auto Industry, Auto Reviews, Lexus | Comments (0)

To Motor Trend: You are PATHETIC and WRONG

June 30th, 2009


Motor Trend recently did a comparo between the 2010 Cadillac SRX and 2010 Lexus RX350 and following is how they summarized in the article:

Simply put, the new Cadillac SRX drives the way it looks: sexy, fun, apart from the pack. It’s full of brand flavor, even if budget shortcuts reveal ragged edges under some of the covers. The Lexus RX 350 drives the way it looks, too: almost annoyingly competent. Cushy and comfortable, reliable and unobtrusive.

Those of you who value Lexus’ “relentless pursuit of perfection” will puzzle over our values in choosing this comparison’s winner. Those of you who understand how we value entertaining driving dynamics over all else will understand. The ‘10 Cadillac SRX is refined enough to overlook its shortcomings and take over the Lexus RX 350 because it’s the luxury crossover we’d prefer to look at and drive, every day. If Cadillac could close its refinement gap with Lexus, the new SRX crossover would be unbeatable in the marketplace.

First Place: Cadillac SRX
Good dynamics with a nice ride-handling compromise overcome refinement shortcomings. Turns out that Cadillac style and attitude work in this segment.

Second Place: Lexus RX 350
This is the benchmark for refinement and sumptuousness in luxury vehicles under $60,000. You will remember feeling coddled; you will immediately forget the drive experience.

At this point one would think that the SRX won this comparo fair and square… However, that’s not really the case with further examination. At the last page of the article MT also provided the OBJECTIVE (read: unbiased) test results and I have summarized a few important ones for easier comparison:

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Auto Industry, Auto Reviews, Lexus, On-Crack Series, Second Opinion | Comments (0)

Review: 2010 Toyota Prius

June 14th, 2009

In a Nutshell: Superb electronics, gas mileage, and reliability; Not-so-superb road manners, sheet metal and interior plastics.

I know it’s been a long wait for my new Prius review. A number of you CL members have requested it, but there wasn’t much I could do. Toyota has not introduced it on the East Coast until now (I don’t remember seeing it at this year’s Washington, D.C. Auto Show either), although I know a couple of you in other areas have already seen it and (maybe) test-driven it. The first new 2010 Prius models are just coming into Washington-area dealerships now, although most shops have only 1 or 2 of them, and some still don’t have any. As expected, like the new Chevy Camaros, most are pre-sold or otherwise not available for a review and test-drive. However, a Toyota shop close to my house had a bright-red, beige-leather, 2010 Prius-V model (the top-line version) demo that it was allowing test-drives in long enough for at least a basic review, so it was into my Outback and off to the review before I lost my chance and someone bought it (my guess is that it won’t last the rest of the day).

The first-generation Prius was introduced the he American market in the late summer of 2000, allowing the first-generation Honda Insight hybrid (a smaller, 2-seater) to beat it by about 6-7 months…..the Insight was introduced in January of that year. Both cars had alrady been on sale for some time in the Japanese home market. As gas was relatively cheap then, neither the first-generation Insight or Prius proved particularly popular at the time here in America; the Insight for its very small size and limited usefulness, and the somewhat larger, more useful Prius for its geekiness and unsual interior and controls. The Prius, at the time, despite its excellent gas mileage, was perceived by many potential shoppers as a smaller, geekier, and more expensive brother to the ubiquitous Corolla, which, of course, sold in big numbers. The then-new electronics in the drivetrain were also, of course, new and unproven in the American market.

Of course, that all changed with the second-generation model. The Prius (and Honda hybrids) developed a reputation for reliability as good or better then most of their conventional gas-engine siblings, and, as gas steadily got more expensive (though still with sharp up-and-down swings in price), the car’s popularity increased with it as well. Fire department and rescue personnel, though, had to go through special training on how to get people out of them after accidents, as damaged electrics and battery packs could be very hazardous to both fire personnel and victims.

And, of course, the car became a status symbol, not just among environmentalists and college professors, but as a Hollywood and celebrity car as well. A number of well-known celebrities, musicians, and entertainers in the Hollywood/Beverly Hills area chose to buy and drive Priuses, even though their enormous incomes allowed them access to some of the finest chauffeur-driven luxury cars in the world like the Rolls-Royce and Maybach. The appeal of the Prius did not just lie in the miserly gas mileage, but in the fact that small Toyota and Honda hybrids had extremely low emissions as well. Many Prius owners bought the car not just to save gas, but to make an environmental statement. It became the ultimate automotive expression of political correctness, since pure electric cars, which were even less-polluting, were rather impractical and range-limited.

For 2010, the third-generation Prius comes in four trim levels; the Prius II, III, IV, and V. All share the same drivetrain…..a 1.8L VVTi-four, permanent-magnet elecric motor, a CVT (continuously-variable transmission), and one of the most advanced Nickel-Hydride battery packs ever to go into a hybrid. As stated above, I reviewed a top-of-the-line Prius V model that started at 27K and listed at over 32K……that may sound expensive, but it is the top model, and much cheaper versions are available in the low-mid 20s, if dealers don’t price-gouge and mark them up over list (as they did last summer with the Prius when gas was over $4.00 a gallon).

After reviewing the new third-generation model, I had mixed feelings about it, overall. It is a superb car if you want the ultimate in efficiency and non-sporting driving in a basic commuting car, and some of the controls/displays inside were improved over the second-generation model, but some other things about it, IMO, proved disappointing. For the details, read on.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , ,
Posted in Auto Reviews | Comments (0)

Review: Lexus LS460

June 8th, 2009

IN A NUTSHELL: Yes, everything you’ve heard, discussed, and read about……….and more.


When the original Lexus LS400 was introduced for the 1990 model year, it was a car that has represented a luxury, quality, pricing, and marketing landmark in the history of Japanese-designed automobiles. Toyota created the Lexus luxury nameplate……and the car that, by definition, represents and typifies that nameplate more than any other Lexus product since.

Along with luxury arch-rival Infiniti and Saturn, a new low-cost division from GM, ( all three divisions were introduced the same year ) Lexus set new ( for then ) standards for customer treatment and service. These three nameplates see-sawed back and forth in both the J.D. Power and Consumer Reports listings as the three highest-rated brands for dealer service and customer satisfaction. The Lexus motto was…..and is…..” The Relentless Pursuit of Perfection,” and the LS400, at the time, despite a few minor issues like a tendency for the brake rotors to warp from the car’s large size and heavy weight, was about as close to perfection as the designers and engineers of the time were able to make it. Its mere presence in the auto market, and its base price ( at the time ) of $35,000 sent the Mercedes and BMW organizations reeling, despite the public contempt for Lexus that the Mercedes corporate people showd at the time. BMW, of course, had, and still has, a highly loyal and dedicated core of sport-sedan buyers, but Mercedes paid heavily for that contempt. In an attempt to keep up with Lexus and compete with them, Mercedes was forced to not only lower the prices on their vehicles but also the quality of many of the parts they used as well. Though Mercedes was……and continues to be…….along with Volvo, one of the auto industry’s most highly-regarded nameplates in safety and crash protection……..this economizing of their vehicles in the 1990’s led to a slow, but steady, and relentless, drop in the reliability of their vehicles. Although there is a loyal core of customers who continue to buy Mercedes products despite their poor reliability, the deterioration of Mercedes vehicles ended up in a vicious circle that drove some of them away from the brand and into new……you got it……..Lexus products. Once they experienced Lexus quality and customer service, they were hooked…..and continued to help Lexus grow into the the luxury powerhouse it is today………..the highest-selling luxury nameplate in the American market.

The LS400 became the LS430 as a new 4.3L V8 engine was developed, not only for the LS but for its sister GS430 as well ( experimental versions of an IS430 were produced for testing and evaluation but never made it to production, even with the new IS model ). The LS, more and more, became the new benchmark for mass-produced luxury cars that the Mercedes S-Class had once been……as the S-Class fell further and further behind the LS in the American market despite the well-deserved reputation of Mercedes for safety…….something Mercedes still merits.

So, now, LS430 becomes the LS460 as an all-new, 4.6L-equipped, 2007 model is introduced, with upcoming LS460L ( long-wheelbase ) models for more rear-seat room and a smoother ride, and All-Wheel-Drive LS600H Hybrid models to follow. The latest model, as befits a Lexus flagship, is a true luxury car that is VERY impressive…easily, along with its sister GS300/350AWD and the new SH-AWD Acura RL, one of the Ten Best new vehicles I have ever driven or reviewed. However, like any car, it is not perfect, due mostly to what are IMO unnecessary design and marketing changes…… of which I will go into more detail below. And it is anything BUT a simple car……..it has a vast number of technology, convienence, safety, electronic, and communication features in both the front and rear seats that take TIME to learn and practice. You DON’T just get into this car, start the engine, and take off. If you do, it will be like trying to pilot a Boeing 747 with only basic-training-plane experience.

So……most of you have heard about, read about, and discussed this car, quite a bit among yourselves, and publically here at CL. Except for some initial comments, I didn’t really get into those discussions very much, for obvious reasons….I was waiting for my own review. Now………here is my take on this remarkable car.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: ,
Posted in Auto Reviews, Lexus | Comments (0)

Review: 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid

June 4th, 2009

In a Nutshell: Superb gas mileage, one of Ford’s best new products yet……..and possibly a sign of the future.

Ford introduced the mid-sized Fusion/Mercury Milan/Lincoln Zephyr triplets (the Zephyr is now the MKZ) in the fall of 2005, as 2006 models, to have a new mid-sized series to bridge the gap between the small Focus and the larger Ford Five Hundred/Mercury Montego (since renamed the Taurus/Sable). The old mid-size Taurus/Sable line had been discontinued, as had the old mid-size Ford Contour/Mercury Mystique series, and Ford needed a new mid-size line to replace them, as the new Five Hundred/Montego were now considered full-size cars (Ford renamed them to Taurus/Sable, but they are not to be confused with the old Taurus/Sable lines. The Fusion/Milan/Zephyr triplets tested out well, made Consumer Reports’ Recommended list, and soon developed a reputation for well-above-average build quality and reliability, most unusual for first-year, American-designed cars (though the new Chevy Malibu, also an impressive design, also did fairly well in the reliabilty department). At first, the Fusion/Milan/Zepyhr (MKZ) were offered with the choice of 4 or V6 engines (V6 only for the MKZ) and FWD only, though AWD versions (with the V6) were later offered.

It is not surprising that these cars have developed a good reputation for quality. Ford’s new corporate leadership, unlike that of GM and Chrysler, has not only managed to keep the company away from the auction block, bankrupcy, and Government bailout money, but appears to be serious about catching up to the Japanese in vehicle quality. Consumer Reports now rates almost all Ford products, with a few truck-based exceptions, as average or better in reliability….far more so than with GM or Chrysler, though some GM designs have shown quality improvement as well.

For 2009, the Fusion line is offered in 3 conventional gas-engine lines…..the S, SE, and SEL (the new Hybrid is considered a 2010 model). As before, two gas engines are offered….a 2.3L, 160 HP four and a 3.0L, 221 HP V6. Three transmissions are offered…a 5-speed manual, 5-speed automatic, and 6-speed automatic. FWD is offered with the Four, and FWD/AWD with the V6 (the Four is not considered powerful enough for the extra weight/drag of AWD). The Hybrid comes with a special, Ford-designed, Atkinson-Cycle, gas 2.5L in-line four with 156 HP and a 106 HP permanent-magnet electric motor of Toyota design (as with the Escape hybrid, Ford and Toyota worked jointly on the Fusion’s Hybrid powertrain). Only four-door sedans are offered in the American market; no other body styles (though I wish that Ford would do a raised, wagon version the compete with Subaru wagons).

Though, of course, it has negative features just like any other car, I was, overall, quite pleased with the new 2010 Fusion Hybrid. Despite a few flimsy-feeling switches and snaps inside, it is apparant that this was NOT a car that was just thrown together carelessly on the assembly line, with little inspection, and then pushed right out the front door to the dealerships. This car showed a number of signs of quality in its materials, solidness, and assembly precision. I know that this will sound like heresy to many of you Toyota/Lexus fans in the forum, but, IMO, the new Fusion trumps the Camry, quality-wise, in several areas, particularly in door solidness and interior trim/hardware (go see the car for yourself if you doubt this). This, of course, is the result, not only of Ford’s efforts to improve quality, but also the fact that Toyota has significantly cheapened new Camrys compared to their predecessors, using flimsier materials. The new Camry still has its traditional butter-smooth, refined drivetrain and a slightly better paint job than the Fusion, but, otherwise, the Fusion, IMO, generally outdoes it. Both the Camry and Fusion, of course, have excellent Hybrid drivetrains (the Fusion’s, of course, is partly Toyota-sourced)…more on that later.

I chose to review a Fusion Hybrid for several reasons, despite the fact that it is a rather hard-to-get model right now. First, there seems to be a lot of CL interest in it, although I did not get any direct review requests. Second, the vehicles that I DO have review requests for have still not arrived in area dealerships except for the new Camaro, and new Camaros are all pre-sold and not available for test-drives (yet). There is also a lot of interest in the new Fusion Hybrid in the general auto press. And, like it or not, we could (?) be looking here at one of the bedrock cars of the near-future. The Obama Administration, just a few days ago, announced new CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) for the 2016 model year just 6 years away (less than that, from an auto-design standpoint, as it often takes several years to design and perfect new vehicles. Obama announced a 36-MPG average-fleet-economy standard for the future, and Congress, for the most part, seems to be going along with it, though it could be modified a little. But, given the Fusion’s superb 41 MPG city and 36 Highway ratings, which is astounding for a car this size and weight (far more than any other mid-side car in the American market), we have what appears to be a new state-of-the-art for this class. No, it can’t match the 51 MPG City rating of the new Toyota Prius, but the Prius doesn’t have this size, weight, or (presumably) comfort. And, with 39 MPG combined, the new Fusion Hybrid easily meets the new 36-MPG CAFE demand that the Government is determined to shove down our throats.

I also had a rather pleasant review in some other ways, too. First, it was a gorgeous day…mild, sunny, and dry. The owner of the Ford shop I went to today was a former Lexus salesman in the past. In fact, he was the same sales rep I had bought my yellow Lexus IS300 from, years ago. His late father had owned a different branch of the same Ford dealership. As I had not seen him in several years, before the review, I went into his office, and we talked over some old times. He knew I was car-saavy, and was interested in my opinion of today’s Lexus and Ford products. I told him I had joined CL several years ago and also had a Subaru. He was more than glad to let me take a new Fusion Hybrid out for a spin. By sheer luck, he had an unsold one there, a black one (and unsold hybrids can sometimes be hard to find, as gas prices, and demand for hybrids, are going up again). It didn’t stay unsold long, though. As soon as I got back to the dealership with it after the review and test-drive, someone else was waiting with a salesman for a test-drive, so I gave him the key and a brief description of the way it drove. That person took it out, came back, and bought it, right on the spot (I didn’t ask how much he paid, but, with the demand for hybrids even in a recession, it was likely at or close to list). And, guess what? I knew THAT salesman, too. A former co-worker of mine, with my help, had bought an F-150 Ford truck from him.

OK, so much for rehashing old times. On with the review.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Auto Reviews | Comments (0)

Review: Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track

May 27th, 2009

In a Nutshell: An superb-driving sports-coupe and serious BMW-fighter, but saddled with some cheap interior and trim materials.

There seems to be widespread CL interest in the new Hyundai Genesis coupe, and I received several requests from CL members for a full-length review. Why Hyundai did not bring a regular, street-version Genesis Coupe to the D.C. Auto Show last month beats me. The car was very soon to be introduced at local dealerships (they just started coming in a few days ago), and, IMO, Hyundai should have had a normal, production model on the floor, unlocked. Normally, Hyundai is one of the best auto companies in the buisness at displaying new models for public access at auto shows without restrictions, but not this time. All they had was a Coupe painted an odd, military-style, gray/green camoflauge….up on a stand, and locked. Go Figure.

Well, no matter. The Coupe is now at Washington-area dealerships, ready to go, but not in large numbers. Most local Hyundai shops only have one or two in stock right now, but more are on the way. Still, even in the tight auto-buying market right now, I would only expect minor discounts for new Genesis coupes….and that’s with some bargaining. Often, new sport-coupes and sports-cars can command a mark-up, and the Genesis coupe probably would too, if there were normal auto-buying times. But this year is clearly NOT buisness as usual. Dealerships will HAVE to discount and/or offer credit if they want to sell cars this year, but with the strong public and auto-press interest in this car, there still are not a lot of incentives for heavy discounts.

Hyundai is introducing the Genesis Coupe as a sequel to the Genesis sedan, but the two models, in my view, couldn’t be further apart. About all they share is the Hyundai badge on the grille and the 3.8L V6 engine block (a 4.6L V8 is optional on the sedan). Not only the exteriors, but the interiors are radically different as well. I was very impressed with the Genesis sedan’s interior, but far less impressed with the Coupe’s, which seemed much more cheaply-done (more on that below). But the coupe makes up for it, at least in the 3.8 Track version, by being an superb-driving sport-coupe…one of the best moderately-priced Drivers’ cars I’ve seen outside of BMW (also more on that below).

6 different Genesis Coupe models are offered, for now (or will be offered), in the American market. These include the 2.0T, 2.0T Premium, 2.0T Track, 3.8, 3.8 Grand Touring, and 3.8 Track. All 2.0T models come with a turbo 2.0L four, with 210 HP and 223 Ft-lbs. of torque….it is somewhat similiar to the one that VW/Audi uses with the same displacement. The 2.0T and 2.0T Premium come with a choice of a close-ratio, 6-speed manual transmission or a 5-speed paddle-shift Shiftronic automatic; the 2.0T Track comes only with the manual. All 3.8 versions, including the Track, come with a 3.8L V6 with 306 HP and 266 Ft-lbs. of torque, and the choice of the 6-speed manual or a 6-speed ZF paddle-shift Shiftronic automatic. Both the 2.0T and 3.8 Track versions also include a Torsen limited-slip differential.

As I mentioned above, not many Genesis Coupes are in stock right now. A Hyundai shop fairly close to my house had an automatic, silver/Black leather, 3.8 Track model ready to go, and offered a solo test-drive, without a salesman riding along, so I jumped at the chance (I knew a number of several CL members were waiting for a review).

I really enjoyed this test-drive….as much as I do with BMWs (and the controls on this car were far less complex than many BMWs). The 3.8 Track is an absolute blast behind the wheel, although, of course, as a responsible driver, I didn’t abuse it, or red-line the engine.

So, what is this remarkable (for the price) sport-coupe really like? Coming right up.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , ,
Posted in Auto Reviews | Comments (0)

Review: 2009 Mini Clubman

May 18th, 2009

In a Nutshell: Noisy and quirky, but good space efficiency, and more comfortable than I expected.

I’m still waiting for the CL-requested reviews of 2010-model vehicles to get into local D.C.-area dealerships so I can have access to them (the 2010 Prius should be a few weeks now, the Lexus RX450H not till July, and the Camaro RS/SS models are coming in now but all pre-sold and not available for test-drives). So, in the meantime, my brother expressed some interest in the new Mini Cooper Clubman (enough interest for a review), so, for him, and for anyone else interested in it, I decided to look at it and share my findings with all of you guys.

In 1959, Alec Issigonis, a Greek-born auto designer who came to England, working in conjunction with the British Austin Motor company, introduced one of the most radical (for its time), far-reaching cars in history, though there is some question as to just how much of it was his idea and how much was that of his staff. The tiny, Munchkin-sized Mini, with its box-square styling and transversely-mounted, in-line engine with front-wheel-drive for maximum space efficiency and traction, was clearly 20-25 years ahead of its time. It eventually, by the 1970’s and 80s, revolutionized the design of a majority of the world’s vehicles, which adopted the basic transverse-engine design. The design so impressed the powers-that-be in England that Issigonis was knighted by Queen Elizabeth….hence the title Sir Alec Issigonis.

Americans, however, used to the 19-foot long, shark-finned, chrome-laden, 350 HP dinosaurs of the period, laughed at the Mini (though Americans were starting to buy the competing VW Beetle in increasing numbers). And, indeed, compared to a Cadillac or Lincoln of the period, the Mini was ridiculously small, and could probably fit into a 1959 Cadillac or Lincoln trunk. Of course, the Mini had the notoriously poor Lucas electrical system that was the bane of most British-designed cars of the period, and that certainly didn’t help endear the car to many Americans either, though the open-top British two-seat roadsters did find somewhat of a market here back then. But, in Europe, the Mini’s popularity took off like free beer at an Irish pub. The Cooper firm, who did Formula 1 racers, tweaked some Minis, and the first Mini-Coopers were born.

The rest, of course, is history. I won’t go into all of the cars and SUVs that the original Mini design influenced…that is well-known by now. But, by 2000, the rights to the Mini design had been bought up by the German BMW company (though the car was, and is, still manufactured in Britain), and their marketers decided that now was the time to try and sell it in America. The first modern, state-of-the-art Minis arrived here about a year or two later and became an instant success….waiting lines at dealerships and price mark-ups became commonplace. In fact, BMW probably could have sold a lot more of them here than they did, had the Mini dealership network been a little more widespread (only certain BMW dealerships were given Mini franchises). In my area, for instance, one of the best new-car markets in the country, there are only 2 certified Mini dealers within 50 miles of my house, and it takes a little effort to get to either of them.

The new Mini-Coopers were first marketed in one body style, a three-door hatchback, and in base and supercharged S-Models. The John Works company, a noted tuner, soon added especially-tweaked models that carried a full dealer/factory BMW warranty. A convertible model was added, with an unusual feature that allowed the covertible top to be partially-opened and simulate an open sunroof. Then, a redesign was done a few years ago that slightly enlarged the car, exchanged supercharging for turbocharging, changed the hood-opening, and added the lengthened, utilitarian, Clubman body style that could haul more inside. But the same cute Mini syling that turned so many heads was still kept…BMW marketers decided not to mess with success.

Unlike the trouble-plauged Minis of 40-50 years ago with the typically poor British build quality, the 21st-century Minis have been quite a bit more reliable for day-to-day driving. But, according to Consumer Reports, the reliability record of the newer models has been inconsistant, and varies by year and component from better-than-average to worse-than-average, so buying a new one is still at least a litte bit of a gamble. But the old days of the Lucas components in Minis constantly shorting out and even burning up are, of course, just that….long gone.

Today, several trim lines of Minis are offered, in base, Cooper S, and John Works versions. There are 3-door hardtops/hatchbacks, 3-door convertibles, and Clubmans. Three engines are offered, a base, normally-aspirated 1.6L four a 118 HP, a turbocharged, 172 HP version of the same engine in the Cooper S models, and a High-Output, turbocharged, John Works version with 211 HP. Two transmissions are offered, a 6-speed manual and a 6-speed Steptronic automatic with shift paddles and manual Sport-Shirt lever. A amazing number of dealer-approved trim and accessory parts are offered, such as American or British-flag roofs, mirrors, checkered-flag racing patterns, etc… (see the web site for details). Roofs are available in a number of colors and patterns for a custom effect, and you can practically order a Mini to your own completely original tastes. And if the dealerships themselves don’t offer enough, there is a huge, cultish, aftermarket-accessory choice as well.

I disagree with the way the American auto press has handled the new Minis. They have generally painted the car, especially in convertible and bright-colored versions, as “girlie” or “feminine” cars; more or less the same way they stereotype VW Beetles and Cabrios. This, IMO, is grossly inaccurate, and is a good example, among many, of why I never joined the auto press myself. There is no reason whatsoever; absolutely none, why a male can’t enjoy top-down driving fun in a Mini (or Beetle) convertible on a nice day, or in any other Mini model, such as the Clubman I drove today. And, IMO, it would certainly be tough to paint a John Works model, with its high power-to-weight ratio and performance-oriented chassis, as a car for wimps.

And, though John Works models start at 28K, they can get expensive with customization and accessories. One in the showroom today had a $45K marked on the window, though the dealer was discounting it down in the upper 30s.(I don’t know anyone that would pay $45,000 for a Mini, and certainly wouldn’t recommend it).

So, enough of the car’s history….on with the review, At my brother’s request, I chose a bright red, base-model Clubman with a silver roof/rear end for today’s review. It listed for a reasonable $25,000, and would have been less without several big options, such as the Steptronic transmission (which it had). It had a black leather (or maybe Leatherette?) interior, and several multi-colored interior factory trim parts (see the option list below). An interesting but quirky car, to say the least, with a number of good and bad points……read on.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: ,
Posted in Auto Reviews | Comments (0)

LexusNet Test Drive: 2008 Hyundai Genesis

May 14th, 2009

The Hyundai Genesis is without a question one of the most high profile new cars, if not the highest, of the year. Before even getting a chance to drive it and reading the reviews I was positive that this car will bring the Hyundai brand to a different level but I still had doubts in my mind. When the positive reviews starting to come in I was convinced that this car is good, very good as matter of fact, but I was still not a “believer”. However, that had all been changed after my test drive today and all I can say is WOW!! This car is so good that in my opinion it deserves nothing short of its own brand, own badge and own dealership network. Followings are my impressions about the car.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Auto Reviews | Comments (0)

Review: 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX

May 11th, 2009

In a Nutshell: A relatively nice, small, AWD sport sedan, but the interior and powertrain, despite more HP/torque this year, need work.

Per CL member request, I checked out the new WRX today. I had already written a split-review of the current-generation, 2008 Impreza 2.5i and Outback Sport, but it was one of my older reviews without pictures/images, not particularly well-written or comprehensive, and, in general, I wasn’t impressed with the way I had written it (I don’t think I did a very good job on that review). So, I decided to start over today and do the new WRX that I had a specific request for. It was probably a good idea, anyway, since Subaru made some changes this year from last year’s Impreza/WRX/STI line.

Subaru introduced the WRX line to the American market, after much cajoling from enthusiasts of the previous 165 HP GT version (dropped), about seven years ago. The WRX, a noted semi-rally Impreza version, had been available overseas for years, but Subaru officials stubbornly kept it out of the American market because they thought it wouldn’t sell here (rallying is not big in the U.S.). Once they were finally persuaded to bring the WRX here, its popularity, particularly with young men and the caps-on-backward crowd, took off like Friday night free beer at Clancy’s Bar….dealers simply couldn’t keep them in stock. Unfortunately, the car’s image, led by some Hollywood bull-****** movies like “The Fast and the Furious”, led to a lot of aggressive driving, accidents, and high insurance rates, particularly with the even spunkier Subaru STi version and the Mitsubushi Evo soon to follow. Clutches and transmissions on early WRX models suffered from hard use and fast launches…the AWD prevented a lot of the normal tire-spin, so the drivetrain took a lot of the punishment instead.

The Impreza line, including the WRX/STi, got several face-lifts and mild redesigns in the intervening years…..Subaru stylists and designers couldn’t quite seem to decide what they really wanted the car to look like, but a major redesign did not come until last year…..2008. The 2008 model Impreza line (its dash was shared with the also all-new new 2009 Forester) represented a true, all-new redesign, not just a minor facelift. Many complaints were received by Subaru loyalists about the new hatchback design, especially, with its French-looking, Renault-like rear end and garish taillights. However, the WRX, like the previous version, was also still available as a sedan for those who didn’t like the hatchback. Complaints were also received, both from WRX fans and from the auto press, about the WRX going more “mainstream” and being softer and less sport-like in the chassis. Subaru claimed to address that this year…..I’ll comment more on the chassis, of course, below.

OK…let’s get to the current line-up. For 2009, Subaru has played musical chairs with the whole line-up of its Impreza models. Base, non-turbo 2.5i 4-door sedan and 5-door hatchback models continue as before, with the Outback Sport and its two-tone paint and winter gear continuing to play the upmarket, non-turbo-hatchback role. Last year’s WRX, with the 224 HP turbo four and 226 ft-lbs. of torque, has been rebadged as the new Impreza GT model…the GT name was brought back after several years of demise. The new WRX, in both sedan and hatchback form, has been upgraded (probably because of the competing Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart) to a 265 HP turbo four with 244 ft-lbs. of torque…..and claimed chasis/suspension changes. A new Premium WRX series adds some standard equipment. The top-of-the line STi model carries on, in hatchback form only, with the 305 HP turbo four with 290 ft-lbs. of torque and a special, driver-controlled, programmable AWD system. All non-turbo models get a choice of a 5-speed manual and sport-shift 4-speed automatic. The turbo GT model comes only with the automatic (that’s right…no manual). The WRX and WRX Premium, conversely, come only with a 5-speed manual. The STi models come only with a 6-speed manual. No vehicles in the Impreza line have yet gotten a 5-speed automatic…..an oversight that Subaru has yet to correct, even with the new 2009 models (However, I basically like the 4-speed automatic, even with its relatively low flexibility…it is smooth, quiet, and slick). Subaru offers 5 different AWD differential systems, each tailored to a specific engine-transmission combination……I won’t go into all the details here.

I posted images, above, of a WRX hatchback, as the hatchback generally outsells the sedan, but I actually test-drove a WRX Premium sedan, as there was only one WRX hatchback in stock at that Subaru shop, and it was already spoken for. I sat in both sedan and hatchback models, however, to check for interior room, but my on-the-road comments, below, apply to the sedan, not the hatchback. The dealership requested that I not put a lot of miles on the WRX sedan during the test-drive, as WRX buyers tend to want as few miles on them as possible, so I agreed to hold it down. I did, however, IMO, drive it enough for a general review, though I didn’t find quite as many different road surfaces to try as I’d like.

Details coming up.

Discuss about this blog entry in LexusNet Forums – Blog Discussion

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , ,
Posted in Auto Reviews | Comments (0)